From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67393: 29.1; Slow to open file if autosave exists Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 19:23:14 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <867cl4kg4l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <83a5r5gdxk.fsf@gnu.org> <87frztc7iy.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: materus213 , Eli Zaretskii , 67393@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 23 18:37:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5wA-00066I-1Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:37:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5vn-0003Nj-0j; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 12:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5vl-0003Na-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 12:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5vl-0006OL-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 12:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5vq-0007Lk-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 12:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 67393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67393.170335302028244 (code B ref 67393); Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2023 17:37:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5vo-0007LU-3e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 12:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:57753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rH5vm-0007LF-Uz for 67393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 12:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7D9560002; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 17:36:46 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87frztc7iy.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 23 Dec 2023 14:34:13 +0000") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:276756 Archived-At: >>> This is a feature: we let the user see the message and wait for 1 sec >>> after showing it, to make sure this particular message is not >>> immediately replaced by some others. From after-find-file: >>> >>> (when (and warn msg) >>> (message "%s" msg) >>> (or not-serious (sit-for 1 t)))) >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> (The value of not-serious is nil in this case.) >>> >>> This is not a bug. >> >> I'm therefore closing this bug report. > > This is indeed not a bug, but I am wondering if it would be better to > utilize `set-multi-message' somehow. We are certainly able to display > multiple recent messages in the echo area. Then, why not allow to keep > more important ones visible for a time period without blocking? It's not easy to temporarily enable `set-multi-message', since it's not clear at what moment to disable it afterwards.