From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69738: Followup Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:49:07 +0300 Message-ID: <867cgzn5jw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4a0215b2e7bb416cf352e867183f745a@posteo.net> <1ed9ea789788d6a6450c86920199b6c6@posteo.net> <8634ronurh.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk6bnbzl.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7096"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org To: rameiko87@posteo.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 14 20:50:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4vZ-0001cT-O1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:50:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4vK-0001MB-FK; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4vI-0001Ly-Be for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4vI-0002qg-3q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4vT-0007rA-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69738.171312057529895 (code B ref 69738); Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2024 18:49:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4uz-0007lh-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:49:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4uv-0007jt-99 for 69738@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4ue-0002oI-JW; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:49:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=U/QDUbI4NRltS34JM6f6sAwArmPlMx1yhEglkO1pXBQ=; b=OiPu8K+yOAGg qNmHP/+0//LDMQdsNpSomGDjYqL35fQhBHPGwBmppf7OxXgvOKjp4XQgZXP9nr1sOURdqZ2ZS91m9 rGkHrrrZ6vDhkrBkzG7FRlpZxrEv1NJoouYqesH121v5dUHKAWWRoG29lBAAiw6Mo/WKJIaWymmfo QZwQfqe44QPh5ocTr1y57XlIWHBLw+SD6BQAtbgnWQ4tjHzvopR7n+wkPRS9IaC39SZJwh4qyF/jl 6F0TnjkQKmHu374WlDwYLv8U/dl/6bTPHbX6sfKwpH6BcrSlIee7SMwAOAv9bhfTrWMblJnvX6dkj fmyEaJL1CizLKGN8EW9VLg==; In-Reply-To: (rameiko87@posteo.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283309 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 17:47:06 +0000 > From: rameiko87@posteo.net > Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org > > To answer your question: your patch doesn't work, and the reason is that > I have Rmail on frame #6 and Elfeed on frame #3. Rmail-reply creates > frame #42, from which both C-x 5 0 and C-x 5 o land on frame #27. C-u - > C-x 5 o goes from #42 to #3, and also from #27 to #3 after #42 was > deleted. Strange, it did work for me. Moreover, the original code always succeeds to switch back to the frame where I have the Rmail buffer, it just doesn't delete the frame where the outgoing mail was composed, so I don't think I understand why the same code doesn't work for you. But I never got to 42 frames, of course. So please show a minimal recipe for reproducing this, after applying the patch I sent, and starting from "emacs -Q -nw". There's probably something I'm missing. Thanks.