From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20734: 25.0.50; "Args out of range" with help-window-select t Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:33:46 +0200 Message-ID: <866172ts79.fsf@members.fsf.org> References: <86vbf3tfwj.fsf@members.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433496945 14140 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2015 09:35:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20734@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 05 11:35:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o21-0007DQ-Fc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:35:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o1v-00027H-Qx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o1r-00024y-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o1n-0004qc-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o1n-0004pS-NY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o1m-0004iT-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Richard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20734 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20734-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20734.143349684818059 (code B ref 20734); Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20734) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2015 09:34:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o0t-0004hD-G1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:45121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0o0r-0004h2-13 for 20734@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 05:34:05 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYKACJscVWkD3Xu/2dsb2JhbABbhEKsVwEBAQEBAQaZWwKCAQEBAQEBAYELQQWDXQEBAwF5EAgDISUPAQRJE4glCNtmAQEBAQYBAQEBAR2GGYUqhQYHhC0BBJoxjAuPXySDeTwxgkcBAQE Original-Received: from wifi-nat238.ulb.ac.be (HELO Aurora) ([164.15.117.238]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2015 11:33:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:27:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103603 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> We can however get a gdb backtrace (I put a breakpoint in Fsignal, but >> it breaks more often than needed, so I say "continue" a few times in >> order to get the following) : > > You can put a break point in maybe_call_debugger, which tends to work > better in this sense. Thanks. Would the following make sense in etc/DEBUG ? -`Fsignal' is a very useful place to put a breakpoint in. -All Lisp errors go through there. +`Fsignal' is a very useful place to put a breakpoint in. All Lisp +errors go through there. If you are only interested in errors that +would fire the debugger, breaking at `maybe_call_debugger' is useful. -- Nico.