From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55169: Can't combine window-min-height with window-height Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 22:29:59 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <865ymlje5o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86y1zp5but.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87czh0gp6m.fsf@gnus.org> <9753db0e-05f2-5927-80fb-50d17f16441d@gmx.at> <86czgxi3nn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86tua7pyfp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5e93dcad-4071-b4e2-d408-ba670413eb67@gmx.at> <868rriil03.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <0e9b53c4-b283-ca20-fa8a-995f2b58ed59@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12392"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 55169@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 21:34:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKlI-00030V-6K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 21:34:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33150 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKlG-0005wm-TP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKl8-0005te-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKl8-0007Uu-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKl8-0004qg-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 19:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55169 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55169-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55169.165169283718628 (code B ref 55169); Wed, 04 May 2022 19:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55169) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2022 19:33:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKl2-0004qO-SC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:54077) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nmKl1-0004qA-AV for 55169@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B562FE0006; Wed, 4 May 2022 19:33:47 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <0e9b53c4-b283-ca20-fa8a-995f2b58ed59@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 4 May 2022 09:54:11 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:231391 Archived-At: >> Do you think it's a too big change in behavior that might break some >> existing configs? > > It introduces a certain inconsistency. So far, 'window-min-height' is > obeyed by 'display-buffer-below-selected' only. My patch would have > other clients obey it as well - but to a certain extent only. For > example, 'split-window-sensibly' will never care whether a window it > splits off can be made 'window-min-height' lines high. How would we > document that fact? I didn't expect that 'split-window-sensibly' should pay attention to 'window-min-height'. I though only 'display-buffer-*' are affected.