From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69738: Followup Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 21:50:28 +0300 Message-ID: <865xwjn5hn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4a0215b2e7bb416cf352e867183f745a@posteo.net> <1ed9ea789788d6a6450c86920199b6c6@posteo.net> <8634ronurh.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk6bnbzl.fsf@gnu.org> <06b44e7b07fcb2d06c7a7f56e4934014@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org To: rameiko87@posteo.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 14 20:50:58 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wM-0002Yz-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:50:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wH-0001Vm-5G; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wG-0001Vd-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wG-00037O-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wR-00081w-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:51:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:51:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69738.171312065130744 (code B ref 69738); Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:51:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2024 18:50:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wE-0007zn-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52896) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4wB-0007ya-IB for 69738@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rw4vt-00035F-S5; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 14:50:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=+eZavDOCHBhyvyzGDSMZTAYW4N49M7brMBTgkGjbg+8=; b=JqrR5d7ur9Di u1NTEYKWc4hr59Y6LMmj9lC+97HExDrQzmZuTLxfUsluVa8mtVLBL9Z9QzT2lxQL5Jb38XovUwx5n 6o4ZNIOKckItLdEwtOBfo2DUMUbbq5WG70mtS9yMgLIMq11GDXoaQ5TgGi5yfPX6YxcGe/QHfyQSH YsHPu1tRM7/6DXG2L6Rul/w6ysQhXVaW6SOHi2TntMTN2agLRAZ9rBSIvxnb8KiWLTuY/hSmMEqnV XoNPiLT3IBVXlUiJeLpx44zB9Q/s/r0IUKDg+mRkyyrycVlu6OQdSyH5KUlE8yRpDiH98GAQs4NYt /WB+I1e40QgYIO/3kIa7og==; In-Reply-To: <06b44e7b07fcb2d06c7a7f56e4934014@posteo.net> (rameiko87@posteo.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283310 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 17:55:55 +0000 > From: rameiko87@posteo.net > Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org > > Actually the neat solution is probably to treat frames as a ring, so > that C-x 5 o would go back to the previous frame. Is there any reason > why frames were not conceived as a ring, but ``rigidly''? Thanks, but it's a non-starter to change how frames are managed, just to solve this minor issue. The solution cannot be too complicated, certainly not with TTY frames, where even the window manager isn't involved.