From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#72692: Emacs 31.05 (40eecd594ac) get SIGSEGV on Linux (Linux 6.6.45 Kde Wayland) Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 10:52:48 +0300 Message-ID: <865xr7zyr3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8b1c8e1f-e0b9-4049-888c-3f723e0008a9@gmail.com> <87y14sd07m.fsf@protonmail.com> <86zfp8wlrv.fsf@gnu.org> <87cym4cvyo.fsf@protonmail.com> <86wmkcwj9c.fsf@gnu.org> <867cc6nv7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87v7zq5jap.fsf@protonmail.com> <86v7zqmdo5.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk1gxz1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a5h030ba.fsf@protonmail.com> <8634mqorkm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8634moj27z.fsf@gnu.org> <86seuovcsr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86le0gh6uf.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5gwv6k3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86frqoh3vg.fsf@gnu.org> <86ikvk4giz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86seunfxtc.fsf@gnu.org> <87frqnv8hy.fsf@yahoo.com> <86a5gvfrc0.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31254"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, execvy@gmail.com, 72692@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: luangruo@yahoo.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 07 09:53:11 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFq-0007xE-Vi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 09:53:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFj-00013c-Dh; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFh-000137-OH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:53:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFh-0001Cx-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:53:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=FfC1WteBUgA9pGHMNqByK8EQDHBrrx3+J5zN+SGw+NI=; b=JUupRWuB5wUOIiSHTBSeZYxp3G61UyUm/Cb4z4+BwUOqplZnxhbCZ3If73oo8jpLD9zkrT9SQaVa6+TEK/C9bgaFrZx9JFDiyQt81EO5bry0XBFi03V8IKZwkSs68Vl6BlhCa0EUgVw3Ndz+5IBC+JmlBHE5lXMX+Ah78oEeqUjss2+LGMEaCFKczmnOMoBQW4nLZ8Ns8AqJvS2ZBn2Zkb5mbI9BvbJqzY02GypDj6zDUmt7tLLSZrImLWlI9dEVyGzcLT984vHzjcKj6EGksCEUifIaR9EeOZiuKQXXy9gJx+zTqcQtFd6DB7fihek9ZaL/IXIxzOp3hzn9XOHlSQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFh-0002IU-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72692 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 72692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B72692.17256955788821 (code B ref 72692); Sat, 07 Sep 2024 07:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 72692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2024 07:52:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFe-0002ID-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFb-0002Hu-NP for 72692@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:52:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smqFV-0001B8-S5; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 03:52:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=FfC1WteBUgA9pGHMNqByK8EQDHBrrx3+J5zN+SGw+NI=; b=REtfCy2waxHk OkbJ5uvy592dmJUbF6cG/HF/YBpNO7c0RJFDxWVGBuwm5nq2SFhWa5JPtMO4oZklhfPRRqQFzBuoR JK4hStfWDhy9zHUqdMKZxOlybocrXGXJ1ErnMyyiuInzk+YSXhPxvkshVsgxevNRZwAP7JeV8lmex 6MxNL66i+/mMlpvxjkZ2tn5dzDx+gZBmT/GcIyjkxvYXiH6MZO6NQfCgWqFQ2u6MpMNBRlUUb5yae eRnyr9EZvlsnUOr2ODUNw/r0b7+LpOUPnDr/a/tNDZwdD9SwVXQuMRPNxDigrVRIHYiKE+GJtu20G 5+2yNqXtN6ifHOy8FHKrgA==; In-Reply-To: <86a5gvfrc0.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:26:07 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:291362 Archived-At: > Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, execvy@gmail.com, 72692@debbugs.gnu.org, > juri@linkov.net > Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:26:07 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > From: Po Lu > > Cc: Juri Linkov , pipcet@protonmail.com, > > execvy@gmail.com, 72692@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 20:06:17 +0800 > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > Po Lu, is there any reason why frame-parameter handlers for GUI frames > > > should ignore the fact that the new value of a parameter is exactly > > > equal to the old value? Is there some subtle issue here, and if so, > > > does it affect all the parameters or only some? > > > > No reason occurs to me why redundant changes shouldn't be discarded in > > the case of alpha-background, but modifications to other parameters > > (e.g. Qfullscreen) always trigger recomputation of various window > > manager properties and states, which is not redundant when these > > properties change without Emacs's knowledge. > > OK, I was aware of the issues with Qfullscreen. > > But what about the rest? Would you mind reviewing the other handlers > in frame.c, and telling which ones should do their thing regardless of > whether the old and the new value of the parameter are identical? Ping!