From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70587: More buffers that ought to be read-only Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:18:15 +0300 Message-ID: <864jbltt1k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87le506i07.n.fsf@jidanni.org> <86jzkkz9f2.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk5wz8a6.fsf@gnu.org> <8734r7b73v.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <86zftfw841.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk5uul0z.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22061"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 70587@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 28 17:19:08 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s16J1-0005YF-1C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:19:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s16If-00010D-3Z; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:18:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s16Id-0000zn-OY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s16Id-0007FN-F1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s16Iw-0008V4-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70587 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 70587-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70587.171431752632657 (code B ref 70587); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2024 15:18:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s16Ig-0008Ue-18 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:18:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s16Ie-0008UR-B9 for 70587@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:18:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s16IE-0007Cw-OR; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:18:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=rG0OX4FTFgLk0P3vX/FPZpdGv6y+a2b5L58atNaWVwI=; b=PwMROea2h9pG jVAEf0XHSKWMnQ1XTcYRCiz7cBhs3B3wcw7B6G90pxVVYZzNgyrhZ26Ivc2HyEGOM4Y6rGVO8sr6Z EjZRQp0ALQc2OzEOAn5exGF+mka9Eu9AisISCiQ94xMj8d+G7C0qgCwudK/5jQ5o4n0EDko1syBYY cOrmvoDT8Eg6lIzl2kNSIZ4SzDlYZV9g8UO4pn5+l1vW5hkBpcGZT8uMO9xrkJPZ4LeexgGveCAh7 oamIXUe0ZoSkhOj6J77RkS1wEy2HdUWnFLoOACimIq34emqwUL+zVSgJb+6k0FRkcjCdn8ipr60VP cSRJlPl0vOPSwNXV3QA9mw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:57:26 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:284091 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 70587@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 10:57:26 -0400 > > > Why should *vc-diff* be read-only regardless of > > diff-default-read-only? And why visiting a .diff file is different in > > this regard? > > I've been wondering the same and I don't have a good answer. > In practice, I edit diffs much more often when they're in a file than when > they're in *vc-diff*, but it's far from clear to me why that is the case. Does it mean you will not be terribly mad if I remove the read-only setting from "M-x diff", and let it behave as every other client of diff-mode?