From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: 74630@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74630: 31.0.50; emacs-mail-verify
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:26:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864j3j1sw8.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1tIiZN-0001hB-LT@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 04 Dec 2024 01:09:05 -0500)
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: 74630@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 01:09:05 -0500
>
> > Not sure what you expected the doc string to say. Would the below be
> > enough?
>
> > Verify OpenPGP cleartext signed messages in the current buffer.
> > The buffer is expected to contain a mail message.
>
> > If the verification fails, the command signals an error.
>
> That is better, becauee it gives enough information to deduce what
> indicates success. But the user should need to do any deduction about
> that, let alone read code and guess what some other functions do.
Thanks, I installed a change along those lines.
> To make the doc string truly clear, it should say explicitly what
> indicates success. That way the user can know, rather than just
> supposing.
I don't know how to describe success in this case, except as the lack
of an error.
> Should the function be changed to display a message, "Signature verified",
> on success?
It says "Verifying...done", which I think is enough (and quite
standard in Emacs).
> Do some people run this function from a hook for every message and
> want to see output only in case of failure?
See above: it displays a message in case of success as well.
> Should it a value indicating success or failure?
I don't know. The values of the relevant functions don't seem to be
documented.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-01 5:39 bug#74630: 31.0.50; emacs-mail-verify Richard Stallman
2024-12-01 12:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-12-04 6:09 ` Richard Stallman
2024-12-04 13:26 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864j3j1sw8.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=74630@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).