From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:46:46 +0000 Message-ID: <861rcsl1y1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83h7m84h9g.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9ao5czu.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnutogrh.fsf@gmail.com> <86wnut8fb9.fsf@gmail.com> <861rd1tbpa.fsf@gmail.com> <83pn0km6y3.fsf@gnu.org> <86ft1f8ara.fsf@gmail.com> <83sg5cjdn8.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1kwjcy2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0qoj9zv.fsf@gnu.org> <83im68j963.fsf@gnu.org> <861rct5dfd.fsf@gmail.com> <83zgzgwww0.fsf@gnu.org> <86sg58wkjp.fsf@gmail.com> <83eegswhy8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (windows-nt) To: 46256@debbugs.gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tj/N1ce9NQLEpUmwU9z28s5GDwQ= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 16:48:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZAL-0000rc-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 16:48:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZAK-00054p-5U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ9u-00054Z-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ9u-0004YR-9x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ9u-00073K-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161504562427039 (code B ref -1); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 15:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 15:47:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38125 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ8y-00071y-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:47:04 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ8w-00071j-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ8u-0004wy-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:38584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ8t-00046M-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:47:00 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIZ8q-0009j3-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 16:46:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201643 Archived-At: On Sat 06 Mar 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 12:09:30 +0000 >> >> >> Thus the ABI hash should also include `system-configuration-features'. >> > >> > Which of the features you think might affect the ABI? I reviewed them >> > a couple of days ago and didn't find any I could convince myself >> > should affect that, but maybe I missed something. >> >> As a reasonably recent example, adding bignum support by default added >> "GMP" to `system-configuration-features' when rebuilding after pulling >> upstream changes, without the user changing the configure command line >> saved in `system-configuration-options'. > > AFAIU, such changes only affect *.eln files if we add new primitives > to Emacs or change existing primitives, and those changes are already > captured by the ABI hash. Right? Perhaps you are right, but we need some input from Andrea on whether these changes affect the ABI. AndyM