From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arash Esbati Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63365: 30.0.50; GCC 13.1 breaks building Emacs with native-compilation Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 12:11:25 +0100 Message-ID: <861q9wigma.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86wn1jtezk.fsf@gnu.org> <83jzxjcac9.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6smopo6.fsf@gnu.org> <835y92dfgd.fsf@gnu.org> <86v8h2k475.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0rqaycc.fsf@gnu.org> <86wn1h3dpz.fsf@gnu.org> <835y91brfv.fsf@gnu.org> <86fs849xb0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ild08i8j.fsf@gnu.org> <86y1lwmfcw.fsf@gnu.org> <83ild06sb5.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5yc6m2e.fsf@gnu.org> <83jzxf5giw.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttn09r3r.fsf@gnu.org> <8634ukuf4d.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6izapkd.fsf@gnu.org> <86il38mpt5.fsf@gnu.org> <86o7d0zbtu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30559"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 63365@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 01 12:13:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rVV0N-0007lV-N8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 12:13:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVV03-00005y-PS; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:12:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVV01-00005a-Nj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUzz-00049C-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVV09-0001Yn-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Arash Esbati Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63365 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 63365-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63365.17067859275917 (code B ref 63365); Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63365) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2024 11:12:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUzG-0001XN-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58256) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUzF-0001WV-2w for 63365@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:12:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVUyz-00042H-K4; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 06:11:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Hi9/OVWdN+NXqezIRPDh6K9qTkQD5X/lAI3SVa4KAGs=; b=FmiGSJFdTSqgvW/a7TbF azjbXBNMMYdfoa3FnjXCEi8O0hysYXmvExyqiagoVAi6PzB1BteBnpTlK0S0jTHxU8fu8eIz+FN+K AgEYdWosKMcTC03D3nof2/BVSGtYmRKvkUWtyfgyFoKODsvraXBC2VdsWgkkzkFOjiSIg+QPnvVsi Sf5NKK5MEtyLrF+sOWbMmPzm+K3ge25J25tX9bn2o0bTQdChlOlbzPN3TLAOU8AjqjMPLiD0kJ0H9 pUZRmRYz4NA3EjKYb2eA/WW+8qgTcQnNC/xX1IwdIIJ8ijXhIml0ZRnxfNUsWo24F9NBZUAcrbz7Q G019ahES2bYsCA==; In-Reply-To: <86o7d0zbtu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2024 13:02:53 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279286 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Does this mean the build of the master branch still crashes for you? > I thought this was resolved long ago... Or do you work around this in > some way? It did crash during this build, yes. The solution provided once was to set '-fno-optimize-sibling-calls', and this is what I usually do and it works: $ CFLAGS='-O2 -fno-optimize-sibling-calls' ./configure ... > Thanks. I think this means the problem with the backtrace addresses > has been solved, indeed: the frames which are printed with file name > and function name looks reasonable. Those which remained "??" I think > are due to optimizations or something. It would be educational to see > a corresponding backtrace from GDB, if you can capture it, since we > will be able then to compare the "??" portions with what GDB knows > about them. Did you give me a recipe how to produce the backtrace from GDB? Otherwise I'll go through this thread and look. Best, Arash