From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75352: 29.4; end-of-buffer is buggy after set-mark-command with some fonts Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 16:43:52 +0200 Message-ID: <861pxid4gn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y0zqvfct.fsf@qaa.vinc17.org> <8634hyd4t7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 75352@debbugs.gnu.org To: vincent@vinc17.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 04 15:45:30 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5P7-000AKw-VJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 15:45:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Op-0000Wh-J9; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Og-0000Qx-96 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Og-0006Qn-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:45:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=4y5ImGnH0Uwl1nk1SMxeUZ9lDySrdYU5f5BQKNv4ma8=; b=HB1U+EyJ0YApnGbPbqJP2hTNuTkbIAA74Oaive/7if0DatXG2rtRzND5gIQ6bB74BfPUEDt0TTNaOul771z18XTgWI1jfd6UWnpNX9icoai9T7t+gA4AU90VNs/IjR2Gd2mAdQhOIp7dduMjXuxgJuhFOSPD73edSOisaDh6aASvcMp0n1C0PDJ+98v8DrjL+WwRfBfU/NVCDunr4GNBueqjSqtz6B61jnbYEPiBT733SkTxf6KrIikBRNlKNwisBycQqEc7rpavAlfe0lD0DES2Ovb6U0OD08adQghANnxxDKFUK4KvgZnSNkf2SIj99zo+YB/9A1yOOkh3qFHucg==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Of-0003CJ-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 14:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75352 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 75352-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75352.173600184412181 (code B ref 75352); Sat, 04 Jan 2025 14:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75352) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2025 14:44:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Nj-0003AP-SZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Nh-00039f-9I for 75352@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5Nb-0006NA-N2; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:43:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=4y5ImGnH0Uwl1nk1SMxeUZ9lDySrdYU5f5BQKNv4ma8=; b=jiHu14uwaLpE 503D6cwKejL4Lu+aRbygxHnBOxSWzoF14i9blrB5vdIaY4nEnz7Bj2obAjFLo+LrrWFoZHvgc07Gn /fBz8sAB4iA5doV6o2eQMADjPTeEQFhcdiHZTSxFEI1AeWyz9yZWR81DWf4BBuH2PfWTCrUFUPzFp ZnEXfK1L8T4FiGnyVMKMyDe9O6eUIEXJq9bl2R7UAx0kC1BgTU3caILRryyW08uUv/9yhYqcSz7mM YpNc1RMBfR228/yx9VUqWjzwcJKwg5kUmBWUPezLiWOKw1cHhwVb5mWcem08V/gpvs8kInedIXqd1 Td+/oPENuBblM+V1oV0a4g==; In-Reply-To: <8634hyd4t7.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 04 Jan 2025 16:36:20 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298417 Archived-At: > Cc: 75352@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 16:36:20 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > So there are at least 3 different specific fonts involved, and in > addition the region's highlight seems to have some effect, and the > frame needs to have a particular geometry. Can you tell why it is > important to understand why what you see happens in that particular > case? We will likely find that Emacs behaves as expected due to the > metrics of the fonts. And one more question: If, instead of M->, you use M-: (goto-char (point-max)) RET do you see the same behavior, or do you see something different?