From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25106: 24.5; easy-menu doc strings Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:51:11 -0400 Message-ID: <85tvb451y8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <45826813-d92b-4769-8ba1-a09c51349b3d@default>> <87r26bittq.fsf@mouse.gnus.org>> <7acd55b6-689a-45bb-917b-0b7cff901c28@default>> > <90eacb4e-822b-4af6-addb-e7d22b68310b@default>> <835znmks9v.fsf@gnu.org>> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="149343"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (windows-nt) Cc: 25106@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 29 16:52:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hs70T-000cdv-2a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:52:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52792 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs70S-0007ml-4O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs70N-0007mb-GX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs70M-0008L3-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs70M-0008Ko-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs70M-0004QE-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25106 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 25106-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25106.156441188016940 (code B ref 25106); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25106) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2019 14:51:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6zg-0004PA-5g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com ([209.85.166.46]:41378) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6ze-0004Ou-FY for 25106@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id j5so116458990ioj.8 for <25106@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:51:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=eFUh0twKcVltprIrKgSy/+wf/FuQpQnl29PDhg7jYpE=; b=q64L+QXLv0uv9VlVI0I5gtPCVEvSqTbEKt/0P9UR8jpM3/gyGKSt/TbPUa4ZuRQcWO znCJ8t5mxTNC19XnI8UwUkQ+txrTMnEEXlBG3JlSGfep3fJIJhHWPHzpJvp4k19wTiXX PASY2jEPPhNf08wJWhH4KIFGuaHi5Dwu4IGLmQm6RMJ/zPWocY1P8WgMeMv+orf93LSV I1tKvxfgizgfU9nAYwFj74lT79kg+PBRAdCV1neHCjiVrSpT0W0mTTdI0DJ22zVzpznc tX2g+9mFL1p+fXpQGfuazjaLXlD73GRmQ3MOcP7jGIBCY7niPF6+zX4Gj1xK3hyv13tN HM4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=eFUh0twKcVltprIrKgSy/+wf/FuQpQnl29PDhg7jYpE=; b=CRl36U/B91ETMSuHPrYX8dc/evW348EPpMXVxs1lqyAe8aOq0QYEru/+IMLJiz/hBQ bCLM5Wi/+SBAukkBR2nncdjOyUKDCoTUo510i4kn0rjojCO5dL51oLc9Kn+Y+S04zFCE hYcJorNo6AH9UiXm4PoAGLeJ3boqdkOGzFApi9Yre2lLiwwM3tLMTmXBZc8ZkrHmU31/ 6qyOLuucvfVnIykcHVYCLz0aH/vEdmX1Fg4EyJoKMJI4Jxr4hA3gYCv6uUqdIZBFsnzP jjZlt6Bf3oc/MLRenE29QJ7+z0N1DxoHMk3MCRtpPmaxqkJeggvbePL36Czho2jIu+Gi eGtA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPfyoVsRPQDOo8MIZO7n0lqmtviCbXBDLwuBj5o6degz6pWJjI jl9G9QQRAlw7Pl9wV2otLp8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJiMXmZDwvAf13IDiEN52oLlJBRvegAxh4sBEusz+/Wmw1CqvU3yQyz0N6aHsK5AO9tfobxg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:aa0d:: with SMTP id r13mr9925068jam.129.1564411872766; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from vhost2 (CPE001143542e1f-CMf81d0f809fa0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.230.51.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm64414809ioa.27.2019.07.29.07.51.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:51:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 28 Jul 2019 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164044 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > The question raised by the report is how to know > what form the returned keymap has. > >> It says nothing about the form of the keymap. > > Exactly. That's the problem reported. > >> So there's no mystery to solve here. >> it just disagreed with you. > > Disagreement about whether the problem should be > addressed is normal - a judgment call. People > judge things differently. Nothing wrong with that. >From what I can tell, Lars just requested a clarification of the original report which failed to specify what functions were being talked about. The disagreement is that Eli thinks specifying the particular form of keymap being returned is not needed (Lars never said anything about that either way). By the way, I also think documenting the particular form of keymap returned is not needed. > As for revisiting a closed report: maybe take a > look at #25195, which was also followed up on > after being closed as wont-fix. The subsequent > discussion apparently caused Lars to change his > mind. I don't think Lars changed his mind about that exactly, he just misread the original report.