From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jenkner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7240: 24.0.50; [PATCH] backward-sentence sometimes overshoots (and breaks doctor) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:51:00 +0200 Message-ID: <85k4b6hvpt.fsf@iznogoud.viz> References: <85wrpfbg49.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311630976 32142 80.91.229.12 (25 Jul 2011 21:56:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de To: 7240@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 25 23:56:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT8E-0003Mz-8z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:56:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36151 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT8D-0001rJ-QR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT87-0001cV-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT87-0000H7-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT87-0000Gn-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT86-0005PE-1l; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <85wrpfbg49.fsf@iznogoud.viz> Resent-From: Wolfgang Jenkner Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7240 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7240-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7240.131163090420696 (code B ref 7240); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7240) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2011 21:55:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT7A-0005Nl-8Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.10] helo=mx.inode.at) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT78-0005NH-2h for 7240@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [85.127.156.12] (port=2229 helo=iznogoud.viz) by smartmx-10.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT71-00055C-LR; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:55 +0200 Original-Received: from wolfgang by iznogoud.viz with local (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QlT70-000Eie-E3; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:54 +0200 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:56:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49606 Archived-At: Since there has been recent interest in this (merge with bug#9133), I'd like to point out that there's actually a patch in my original report. Perhaps the author of the change which caused the different behaviour is in the best position to decide the matter, though, so I am CC'ing him hereby :-) Wolfgang