From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jenkner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14804: Gnus spelling fix: unexist -> nonexistent Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:00:48 +0200 Message-ID: <85ehb7lwfz.fsf@inode.at> References: <51D7E64E.40601@cs.ucla.edu> <87d2qvzomv.fsf@building.gnus.org> <51D8977B.2060009@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373374995 1970 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2013 13:03:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 14804@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 09 15:03:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXZa-00007I-6y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:03:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56536 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXZZ-0007bs-PP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXZS-0007bQ-Ce for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXZQ-0007dj-2r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXZQ-0007dc-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXZO-0004rB-QF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:03:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Wolfgang Jenkner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14804 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 14804-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14804.137337495118592 (code B ref 14804); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2013 13:02:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41825 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXYs-0004pl-Pw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mx16.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.18]:48838 helo=mx.inode.at) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXYp-0004pJ-IG for 14804@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:02:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.119.88.127] (port=2852 helo=localhost) by smartmx-16.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXYj-0005re-9b; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:02:21 +0200 Original-Received: from wolfgang by localhost with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1UwXXE-0002gW-Rn; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:00:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <51D8977B.2060009@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:17:31 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76127 Archived-At: On Sun, Jul 07 2013, Paul Eggert wrote: >> it's probably "non-existent" or "unexisting". > > Those are both English words, but "unexisting" is rare nowadays > (almost obsolete), and "unexist" itself is not English. Searching the web, however, suggests that, e.g., "make it unexist" is quite commonly used, even where the context otherwise indicates that people care about language usage. Wolfgang