From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40278: 27.0.90; Flickering in Windows 10 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:21:42 -0400 Message-ID: <85blododh5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <5e80c8ad.1c69fb81.73345.30e9@mx.google.com> <83y2rj3wfp.fsf@gnu.org> <834ku63pj1.fsf@gnu.org> <85imilolpt.fsf@gmail.com> <83o8sd3ifz.fsf@gnu.org> <85ftdpojb8.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1313ddl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="520"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (windows-nt) Cc: 40278@debbugs.gnu.org, nicolasbertolo@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 21:22:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzzC-000Y2J-2i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:22:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzzB-000176-36 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:22:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzz1-00013h-9F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzz0-0000bY-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzz0-0000b7-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzz0-0001C3-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40278 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40278-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40278.15855961134566 (code B ref 40278); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2020 19:21:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzyr-0001Ba-1e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:21:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com ([209.85.222.170]:40056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzyn-0001BJ-LW for 40278@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id l25so20391045qki.7 for <40278@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=YldAuWofwtcuUvRi71VQ6xS7B5NZ4kVRLe05ZYjNBd8=; b=OiZU6QOzs8R8Ym0Hkt4LYXCQCuhpMEui9zMnfSvx6ppoKstlqkntijTXsnwUnNw2kp Geqvw61Wco6fSz8DHFV4ongfLrXnCzpRrgTnppLlQWz3Z7+glIvZfYoI2FDYIx+uwDmQ zA1w2Qa0r69i2fLKYAawsGCv7axkgaBAuoHQ12b10C6eJg67XScdPXsOaC/shPSyUNaJ 29HhiG/jh3+ZQvTHhXED3gqfRVYYt7MgnGFpec/nQfQj7C8qc+NvZaqpyO/lxrRheGpM Zo6OP1WmM16l/iCe6D8bjyWAGJLbZoga5DbDUw7P88lyY+UTkEaqDOFuO3mh0eZIGdbk T/+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=YldAuWofwtcuUvRi71VQ6xS7B5NZ4kVRLe05ZYjNBd8=; b=R04iZFz2rY1AAT+/ce74CYHzLC5azf0dXT/wP+X5o4ZtjQH20FBDchgSwBFv2QjZEo eQW5mgxy3rHRkR0I/rFqRDk1H8htOw1+XwKLUP1ZSIXdasg7Qg00J4G/t7QTHQ+RhS+P BBuBqnk4WTOmdgv8CY0NxTXLgfHXEXXcsvRfJK1BWlqjpaL7hcsU2nffm1JtKYonHw6o ZLLe2oogS6/bg/IXbx4jOrhifSIHiI9fr6/jDChKpHoHA9fZenl2dFhdoGdvqTcJSE8z 7WtPcUvUEY0N1jMD4Stg6ZMxakDvrYkdEadybXriz97/Aoyq04oosPVdTsEon4vHtZj+ OkLA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2YV7x5guujQlxhFoZkKO5mKENEcZRrsiBwZ5puM+o3r8vgzLZc ZYll9j7CbZC1cOQsRFgAaxk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvSv02jD7fL9DL1LhYhsd/oXYpq33n7qVwy1VD7OxT0a6LpY9PQVVPuC34F5MhJqgtxdWxRqw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:741:: with SMTP id 62mr1556341qkh.422.1585596104170; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from vhost2 (CPE001143542e1f-CMf81d0f809fa0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.230.38.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k18sm4830928qkh.46.2020.03.30.12.21.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:21:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k1313ddl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:29:26 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177881 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > What do you mean by "beneath" in this context? >> >> There's occasionally a rectangle which seems to repainted slower than >> its surroundings. That rectangle is lower down (closer to my desk than >> the ceiling) on my monitor than the child frame. Also, I guess the text >> it momentarily contains was previously behind the child frame in terms >> of z-order (although it's a bit hard to tell because the repainting is >> still too fast to really anything). > > What are the dimensions of that rectangle? Is its width identical to > that of the parent frame, or is it smaller? If smaller, is the width > similar to that of the child frame or different? The width is similar (equal, as far as I can tell) to the child frame.