From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Siart Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13149: 24.3.50; Emacs thinks file was changed outside Emacs, but it was not Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:50:25 +0100 Organization: Technische =?UTF-8?Q?Universit=C3=A4t_?= =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=BCnchen?= Message-ID: <84zjxzwa72.fsf@siart.de> References: <6CDE13E3BCAA4AFAAB8BCE105C6ABF12@us.oracle.com> <50F8D150.8030200@gmail.com> <50F8D731.5020001@cs.ucla.edu> <50F8D93B.1040901@yandex.ru> <50F8DCCB.1030602@cs.ucla.edu> <83a9s67wlr.fsf@gnu.org> <50F9C009.9060708@cs.ucla.edu> <50F9D213.3070901@yandex.ru> <50F9EF01.5000703@cs.ucla.edu> <50F9F250.1030406@yandex.ru> <50FA06F1.2000308@cs.ucla.edu> <50FA1AEF.9070700@yandex.ru> <50FA265E.80301@cs.ucla.edu> <22A7346C22DB439382C55EF3F7398DBA@us.oracle.com> <510C4008.6070609@cs.ucla.edu> <83halvaw4o.fsf@gnu.org> <84hak7g4vn.fsf@siart.de> <83hak71g8f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363715525 23055 80.91.229.3 (19 Mar 2013 17:52:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:52:05 +0000 (UTC) To: 13149@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 19 18:52:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0hX-0001D9-Tc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:51:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42381 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0hA-0008FO-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0h5-0008FB-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gz-0001dP-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gz-0001dL-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0ib-00042P-Gq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <6CDE13E3BCAA4AFAAB8BCE105C6ABF12@us.oracle.com> Resent-From: Uwe Siart Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136371556115489 (code B ref -1); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Mar 2013 17:52:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0iG-00041l-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47807) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0iD-00041d-73 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gV-0001Nb-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:51889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gU-0001NU-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gT-0007t8-IE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gR-0001JL-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gR-0001IT-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UI0gk-0000CU-V3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:51:06 +0100 Original-Received: from p5de954c3.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.233.84.195]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:51:06 +0100 Original-Received: from usenet by p5de954c3.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:51:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5de954c3.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9ol8QncVLAfBTB1xRXeKPidV5fs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72716 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > (Why do you use FAT32, btw? it's so much worse than NTFS.) You're right. I'll consider to migrate everything to NTFS. The reason why I still prefered FAT32 was that I used to backup some directory trees by sync-ing them against FTP servers. NTFS volumes were out of sync whenever we changed to daylight-saving time and back because windows returns a modified timestamp on NTFS volumes, while FTP doesn't. I avoided these annoyances stolidly keeping at FAT32. -- Uwe