From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nyc4bos@aol.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10034: 24.0.91; max-specpdl-size error Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:43:13 -0500 Message-ID: <84k470wx4e.fsf@aol.com> References: <84bosg634i.fsf@aol.com> <4EBFA0B7.20400@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321415075 30116 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2011 03:44:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10034@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 04:44:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWQH-0000cx-NG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:44:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWQH-0002n1-90 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWQC-0002mw-4F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWQ8-0006zO-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWQ8-0006z8-2B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWQo-00049H-6F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nyc4bos@aol.com Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10034 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10034-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10034.132141505215878 (code B ref 10034); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10034) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2011 03:44:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWPz-000482-JD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from imr-da05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQWPw-00047v-Pm for 10034@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.3]) by imr-da05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pAG3hJt9004622; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from STATION03 (173-13-86-254-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.13.86.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 2AC3BE0000C9; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:43:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4EBFA0B7.20400@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:49:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (windows-nt) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1321414999; bh=YUICAoJpx+izbXqdWBkU1BI8ulzNTlV4m88RN285uwg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EFrx9mAyTaYxke0nUzF936Ap2QC/W1g69HOgC0Mky5hMON79Et5qdyAmUQrXqF2Cz wcKCsMrELPDjQFhvjz1pw41qjNGhxP+Q1Ans3gZyB8DqXH1v57Fe/o8YRzOCj8qMcE EuLFINSVrcgnPIRjBHmBIju6bFZj4F7TR9NhYG4A= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:437339104:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d29034ec33157104f X-AOL-IP: 173.13.86.254 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:45:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53971 Archived-At: [I didn't receive Stefan's email but saw this on the mailing list. Perhaps he only sent it there?] Stefan Monnier writes: >> window-min-size-1: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size > > Please first try to: > > rm lisp/window.elc; make > > just to make sure you're not seeing the recent "rebuild" problem. I'm using the pre-built Emacs Windows build and don't have the make utilities on this machine. Presumably, this will suffice: emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile lisp/window.el Dunno if it's related to a possible "rebuild" problem but I also got: >> Error during redisplay: (error "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size") >> image-search-load-path: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-sizeError during redisplay: (error "Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size") FYI: Looking at timestamps on the .el/.elc files, I see: 11/07/2011 09:12 PM 231,600 window.el 11/07/2011 09:12 PM 197,385 window.elc which I believe is the time that Christoph is compiling the .elc files and then copying both .el and .elc to a ZIP archive. Dunno for sure but I believe he is compiling .el files beforehand. In any event, your suggestion to recompile the .elc file is prudent and helps to rule out the "rebuild" problem. Thanks.