From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57837: 29.0.50; fit-window-to-buffer should reposition the buffer Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:34:01 +0000 Message-ID: <84acc36e7e748d1b29fd@heytings.org> References: <84acc36e7e03e4cba89d@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35181"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57837@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 23:35:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIzR-0008ye-9J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 23:35:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52278 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIzQ-0002A3-DM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIzG-00026w-CZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIzG-0008Vl-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIzF-0001MQ-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57837.16633640465142 (code B ref 57837); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 21:34:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIyM-0001Ks-BC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:45138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZIyJ-0001Ki-Fv for 57837@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:34:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663364042; bh=5l1F1YT/f+5QuBLEb+oBIewVT2yVGlvr9GHWEZUkEoQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=RcR+bEDUPTH1UaSG6cGFZy56brMdmhuLPjfUF9zrJA4GL/rBUdnElQZYpsbLEpgFA z+r2L+76DcipYQdECqvWaclQ5OoxVhVTcE5PgavelIdysRHOLWcCQgn+TF9ixJbJ5s +jsu4udrH0ca0VfYXPF+b25KE2uDT+zxlgeBF63BkO/ffXPmEBLLUAru8fjo70C05C 8FLpOtTF8w43YqTs8oLNDCbcFoICct3R/uES4S1UysMMqIYKTnOk3KlkN/reg4Ngwb qauyR4lYQaoR1uNvoKb67mxRgVv6Z/CPehOnOamXUSUxKlRQ0bkEty32IWjS7DMMBa oc/ugI1rmutRQ== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242815 Archived-At: > > is it possible for Emacs return nil from (pos-visible-in-window-p > (point)) > It is not impossible, but if it happens, it's a bug. > > Both invisible point and point moved before the EOB are, IMO, preferable > over showing a half empty window after C-x w -. > I get that that's your preference, but I hope you understand that this is a corner case, and that what the code does is not a bug.