From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41531: 27.0.91; Better handle asynchronous eldoc backends Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:40:01 +0300 Message-ID: <84a17480-cf10-8176-3080-61e5947ac6ed@yandex.ru> References: <875zckuet9.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgecssch.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuynsdp6.fsf@gmail.com> <5d768a69-3574-10c5-e80a-8ab77ec60462@yandex.ru> <87h7umop62.fsf@gmail.com> <671983cf-e4f5-f128-541b-ceac793f35e5@yandex.ru> <877dvfiofy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25185"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: 41531@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , andreyk.mad@gmail.com To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 07 16:41:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jsomS-0006SR-Is for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:41:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49002 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsomR-0002pF-LU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsomM-0002nK-02 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsomL-0006qJ-NQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:41:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jsomL-0007FO-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:41:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41531 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41531-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41531.159413281027766 (code B ref 41531); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41531) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2020 14:40:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jsolW-0007Dl-5l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:42741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jsolV-0007DU-3x for 41531@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id o11so45449348wrv.9 for <41531@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:40:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tmdLsAhQ1lGSzm8Y9I+NKexP/sI22/aW+rBNrrDBgAI=; b=IEDv1QHOrKvIxXwaugIs/YrmZeKFbI2rrFVkHWKJuHm7BRl1JYuWYKNlGrK0oVHBMa hHQD8m03Q7JUfDm9BToxYJH6YViTq0pUqbmlA4B8Mvqte6ArysxFSGxckaBfIopo54Hx qulL7uuED3ILaq0mG4ScYHk+3PqxETUV37P7CrPAibYxSYqLd/Igh5okuU1ZZUuIMckQ HnvXM7SHTtIwoOElvhcSdHYpXk/C3tbPJ03ldN1A1AM4cBqnEv0kNx25rxQowVlilUeb c40elBg2krhGALAu81jNB8Uk1h9YL+wA0arrTC0wrz7PHpIZt5Zv3pPA2CvhCqlrmk/B W0Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tmdLsAhQ1lGSzm8Y9I+NKexP/sI22/aW+rBNrrDBgAI=; b=kYqdZjsnsiGfRGFaNCmJaFMVfdciUkjoUeP74iBi4583NiTCNLCWnZRLK96BxL8tFu UjThJVzgDIauTRYIq18LHzYBhg6EOvIqLv1dBQN7Lmrq09k+iDRpoZtcs0pf0mlnhO7C TlvoS5+p9//M1vL8e3sN0H95en/Hh2UFcpklZ/LIIxEdGB0Mrx5SDjLf4jAlT/t4ay0O fVRXdJgLldJ2I/chultBLfVIZHnmf1vq/8dpOd8Q5BGL6P0XRgUdnK7KrfgnCs0IV9oR nWeP+rN+v3xrKOnU106/6M96oBLjy/HK6xaCD8i/jFvaA+yXdA7Wd+ZVw1GxSO2asvYW ccOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FyapIO3tsj/VSMqJ/4x1FQIlCxcttiJFgsK20kHZB2BP+SHlc 1TRq9UVzo7MqhQld/4TGNBA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyUgnILBhalOJyE4hv7dKYcwRym7Ntabw+yD/Azl04QnYd4pUyADl1/NPJyUHoPMmXsPp7bQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ed47:: with SMTP id u7mr58421602wro.201.1594132803193; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm1320613wra.86.2020.07.07.07.40.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:40:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877dvfiofy.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182790 Archived-At: On 07.07.2020 13:56, João Távora wrote: > Are you in any way trying to say that you presented a "simple solution" > that somehow magically solves the problems of Eldoc? If you do, you're > living in conflict with reality. > > There is the problem to be solved. And then there are techniques for > solving the problem. These are two entirely separate things. To be > absolutely clear: you have not, ever, proposed an alternate solution to > the Eldoc async_problem_. Perhaps there is a misunderstanding here. What would it take for you to say that "the problem" is indeed "solved" to a sufficient degree that your work on Eglot can continue? If you could mention both the strictly minimum conditions, as well as the "bonus round", that would be great.