From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12811: 24.3.50; `scroll-up/down-aggressively' don't seem to work as expected Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:19:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83zk2ow1ry.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ip9i3c59.fsf@gnu.org> <831ug62z3c.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4o51h92.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352650792 24171 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2012 16:19:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12811-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 11 17:20:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaGO-0005dV-Mf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:20:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaGE-0004dh-RQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaGA-0004dC-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaG7-0003hq-Dp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:19:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaG7-0003hE-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:19:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaGQ-0003no-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:20:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 12811 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 12811@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 12811-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D12811.135265078814589 (code D ref 12811); Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12811-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2012 16:19:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaGB-0003nG-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:19:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:59682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXaG8-0003n8-Sy for 12811-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:19:46 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MDB00900ZYBRD00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 12811-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:19:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MDB009URZZPMN50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:19:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66763 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:33:33 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 12811@debbugs.gnu.org > > The second test (related to `scroll-down-aggressively') produces a > better result (point shown at line 9 - 80% from the top) but not the > expected one (line 8 - 70% from the top). Emacs doesn't count in lines, it counts in pixels. And since a line has a finite size, where exactly those 70% end is not well determined (is it the top of the line, the bottom of the line, somewhere in between?). > In any case, since the result is almost the right one, and more > importantly, since I've discovered that these two variables are not > worth the trouble, I'm ok with closing this bug report now. Thanks, closing.