From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13140: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:59:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83zk1k8tr6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355241643 4503 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2012 16:00:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13140@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 17:00:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSGI-0000W3-Qv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:00:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSG6-0007eH-5g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFy-0007df-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFo-0003Of-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFo-0003Ob-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSGT-0002MF-K3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:01:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13140.13552416319020 (code B ref 13140); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2012 16:00:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37298 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFy-0002LQ-RF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:47844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSFi-0002L2-6o for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:00:29 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEV00500J27G700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 13140@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:59:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEV004GKJ36VVB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:59:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <91C0728B74624F9CAD94D9F80F7B48D3@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68319 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:49:33 -0800 > > BTW, ever since the introduction of the emacs_backtrace.txt files, when I get a > crash now I get TWO fatal-error dialog boxes, not one. One is on top of the > other (staggered slightly), and interacting with the top one (I click No) > removes both of them and ends Emacs (closes all frames). This means Emacs gets a second fatal error while processing the first one.