From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16405: info on non-existent node shows raw info buffer Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:24:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83zjn4b5x9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bnzkgt50.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389342313 8708 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2014 08:25:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16405@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 10 09:25:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XP4-00029X-1r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:25:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XP3-0002Lg-Kf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XOw-0002LA-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XOp-0007rh-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XOp-0007qY-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XOo-00065g-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16405 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16405-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16405.138934228023369 (code B ref 16405); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16405) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2014 08:24:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44710 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XOR-00064o-6L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:56406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W1XOO-00064f-QQ for 16405@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 03:24:37 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZ600400F5RKI00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 16405@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:25:14 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZ600MYUFE1VG60@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:25:14 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87bnzkgt50.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83225 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:04:11 +0200 > Cc: 16405@debbugs.gnu.org > > BTW, I see a similar problem with > > (info "(File That Does Not Exist)Node That Does Not Exist") > > It displays an empty Info buffer. I guess it would make sense to visit > the Dir node in this case. Only if you are not in Info already, I hope. Otherwise, visiting DIR doesn't make sense: we should stay put in the node where we were.