From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21131: minibuffer repl delay Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:48:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83zj2kysxd.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437850162 6931 80.91.229.3 (25 Jul 2015 18:49:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21131@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, cstacy@dtpq.com To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 25 20:49:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4VS-0002wp-3T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 20:49:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4VR-0001de-G7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4VO-0001dI-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4VK-0003l2-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4VK-0003kv-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4VK-0007hz-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21131 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21131-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21131.143785013029607 (code B ref 21131); Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21131) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2015 18:48:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4V7-0007hS-Ax for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:49530) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJ4V4-0007hH-6b for 21131@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NS2000003XSLY00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 21131@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:48:44 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NS2000IX49789C0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:48:44 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:105126 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:28:19 -0400 > Cc: 21131@debbugs.gnu.org, Chris Stacy > > I really think this behaviour should be optional, and off by default, or > on a separate command. Separate command or an optional behavior triggered by an argument, would be fine, I think. > Personally I have never wanted/needed the character representation of > numbers printed in this way. I have. One frequent (for me) use case is when I see a codepoint in hex and want to know which character that is.