From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:22:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83zik4fdug.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8737hwllow.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481354532 27324 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2016 07:22:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 07:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25154@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 08:22:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbyy-0006OB-GH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:22:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50601 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbz2-0007Sk-Cp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:22:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbyv-0007M8-Kq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:22:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbys-0008WH-GK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbys-0008WD-Cr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbys-0007UD-6w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 07:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25154 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25154-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25154.148135451328762 (code B ref 25154); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 07:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25154) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2016 07:21:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36496 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbyj-0007Tq-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbyi-0007Tf-Qu for 25154@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbya-0008T4-Lh for 25154@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:21:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbya-0008Sz-IU; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:21:44 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4961 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cFbyZ-0001t4-N5; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:21:44 -0500 In-reply-to: <8737hwllow.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alex on Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:36:15 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126792 Archived-At: > From: Alex > Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:36:15 -0600 > > Compare the following: > > (let ((x 5) > (x 6)) > (+ x 10)) > > => 16 > > (cl-letf ((x 5) > (x 6)) > (+ x 10)) > > => 15 Isn't it true that the order of evaluation in a 'let' is unspecified? If you want a particular order, use 'let*'.