From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25548: 25.1; Wrong Emacs version for Emacs 25.1.2 (?) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83ziicz758.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<<7901d1e7-e41f-4877-a1bb-6b059d10f39a@default> >> <<<38cc5265-9e0f-433b-bb6e-02f371006061@default>>> <<<83y3xx0x1p.fsf@gnu.org>>> <> <<8337g41ohu.fsf@gnu.org>> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485541998 19346 195.159.176.226 (27 Jan 2017 18:33:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25548-done@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 19:33:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBKh-0004UP-CK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:33:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47321 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBKm-0004k0-Pg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBKb-0004in-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBKY-0005rM-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBKY-0005rG-Mu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBKY-0005QV-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:33:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 25548 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 25548@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 25548-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D25548.148554193020798 (code D ref 25548); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25548-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 18:32:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBJi-0005PO-2E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBJh-0005PC-7J for 25548-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBJX-0005OQ-Ue for 25548-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBJX-0005OL-SF; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4651 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBJW-0003zy-NF; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:31:59 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:13:04 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128692 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:13:04 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 25548@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Show does a user or Lisp code see those options from _within_ > > > Emacs? > > > > With "M-: system-configuration-options RET". > > I see this from `C-h v system-configuration-options": > "--without-dbus --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=-O2 -static -g3'" > > How does that tell you anything about the label "25.1.1", > which appears in the output of `M-x emacs-version' or > the label "25.1-2" that appears in the zip-file name? It tells you what the version number means. > > > > See the node "Version Info" in the ELisp manual. > > > > > > The only thing there (that I can see) that remotely refers > > > to something like "25.1.2" is the undescribed, unexplained > > > _output_ of `(emacs-version)': > > > > > > "GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.16) > > > ^^^^^^ > > > of 2015-06-01" > > > > No, it also explains how to distinguish official releases from pretest > > versions. > > That's not what I said. It tells you nothing about what > "24.5.1" (or in the current case, "25.1.1") means in the > output of `emacs-version'. And it tells you nothing about > what (in the current case) "25.1-2" means in the name of > the zip file. It does to me. > > > Can you point me to the passage that explains the 25.1-2 in the > > > zip name, which I've not been able to find? > > > > That's the "-n-" part above. > > Yes, n = 25.1-2, here. But where is the explanation of it, > saying what n = 25.1-2 means? The explanation is in the value of system-configuration-options. > GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2016-11-15 > > It says 25.1.1, not 25.1.2. Yes. > Still looking for an explanation of such numbering, in both > the output of `emacs-version' and the zip-file name. Time to finish this nonsense.