From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31576: emacs-lisp-intro.texi - NAME, TITLE inconsistency among @node, @unnumberedsec Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 05:38:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83zi0pbwxb.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527129432 16319 195.159.176.226 (24 May 2018 02:37:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 02:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31576@debbugs.gnu.org To: Van L Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 04:37:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg7l-00045l-VO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 04:37:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg9q-0000Q1-Vl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg9h-0000Pr-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg9e-0004Xh-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg9e-0004XX-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg9e-0005WV-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 02:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31576 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31576-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31576.152712948921171 (code B ref 31576); Thu, 24 May 2018 02:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31576) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2018 02:38:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg8n-0005VP-Fs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg8l-0005VD-UD for 31576@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg8d-0004FQ-Iy for 31576@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg8d-0004FL-FL; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:37:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3257 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fLg8c-0005pb-Lp; Wed, 23 May 2018 22:37:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Van L on Thu, 24 May 2018 10:41:55 +1000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146457 Archived-At: > From: Van L > Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 10:41:55 +1000 > > Hello. > > IMO, having `@node NAME' consistent with `@unnumberedsec TITLE' is better in an intro. I'm not sure I understand why. This is an introduction to Emacs Lisp, not to Texinfo. All our manuals use different names for nodes and for corresponding chapters/sections, primarily because the node name is just a label, and also because some characters should not appear ion a node name. I see no problem here.