From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34726: epa-insert-keys Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:19:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83zhq5aicy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zhq9cnio.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="110099"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 34726@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 09:21:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Akj-000SWz-MO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:21:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Aki-0001ux-MU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:21:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Akb-0001sk-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Aka-0002AS-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2AkY-000294-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2AkX-0003dw-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 08:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34726 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34726-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34726.155203320913923 (code B ref 34726); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 08:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34726) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2019 08:20:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Ajh-0003cV-D7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39077) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Ajg-0003cD-7g for 34726@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Ajb-0000t3-3X; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1571 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2AjH-0007uw-7u; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:19:46 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 07 Mar 2019 23:14:54 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156135 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 23:14:54 -0500 > Cc: 34726@debbugs.gnu.org > > What in the "original" should I read? I looked at the GPG Info file > which that text came from, as an Info file, but I see no further info > there to understand what those letters actually mean. Doesn't that mean this particular part of the bug report should be sent to the GPG developers, asking them to clarify the GPG documentation? IMO, it's unreasonable to expect Emacs to rectify documentation problems of every program we happen to invoke.