From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#583: Use XDG basedir spec for configuration files? Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:29:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83zhjtb6di.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="263933"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: ferkiwi+a@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 583@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 28 18:38:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i30xo-0016T2-V4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:38:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i30xn-0001Ds-38 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:38:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pk-0001Wq-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pi-0002FM-8w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pe-0002A5-KR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pe-0001BO-Fb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B583.15670097884499 (code B ref 583); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2019 16:29:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51150 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pP-0001AT-RF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pO-0001AE-08 for 583@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pI-0001mg-LB; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2630 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i30pH-00048K-GI; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:29:39 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:11:21 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166015 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:11:21 -0400 > Cc: ferkiwi+a@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu > > It's great to finally see some progress in this area, but IIUC this is > still not really following the XDG spec. For example, I think a proper > solution would see user elpa packages stored undo XDG_DATA_HOME, etc. Yes, because we don't set user-emacs-directory from XDG_DATA_HOME. We only load the init files from there.