From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38796: 26.3; `view-lossage': Use a variable for the lossage limit Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:04:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83zh6fz4q1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <43aac56d-ecf1-44ed-9be1-ffb8e5f8a7ce@default> <83zhfbm448.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh8pij6e.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <83v9jc3o3q.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo3qj1s6.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <87eenygyrx.fsf@gnus.org> <87d03beq3g.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31950"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: uyennhi.qm@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, 38796@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 08:05:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXVe-0008C4-1S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:05:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXVc-0008R4-HZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXVW-0008Qx-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXVW-0006E4-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXVV-0000f4-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38796 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38796-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38796.15985946642487 (code B ref 38796); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38796) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2020 06:04:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44897 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXUu-0000e3-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:04:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXUs-0000dr-Ae for 38796@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXUm-0006By-HE; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2228 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kBXUl-0003dr-Tb; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:04:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d03beq3g.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Tino Calancha on Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:28:03 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186580 Archived-At: > From: Tino Calancha > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier > , 38796@debbugs.gnu.org, uyennhi.qm@gmail.com, > stefankangas@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:28:03 +0200 > > People agree with that. The friction arises because I kept the current > implementation, which can be seen as abusing on it, and/or risky. > [ I have neither plan nor time to redo the current implementation. ] > >> Users can still safely modify the lossage limit with the > >> command `update-lossage-size'. For convenience, add > >> a function `lossage-size' to return the current limit. > > > > Hm... other functions use the convention of having a zero-parameter > > function return the data, and having a parameter to set it. So > > (lossage-size 500) could set it and (lossage-size) could return the > > current size? > I have amended the patch to do this. Thank you. > > FWIW I have been running Emacs almost 3 months using this branch > with no issues. > If Eli is OK with it, I can merge it to master next week. Sorry, OK with what? where's the patch which I should agree with?