From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
Cc: uyennhi.qm@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, stefankangas@gmail.com,
38796@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#38796: 26.3; `view-lossage': Use a variable for the lossage limit
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:04:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83zh6fz4q1.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d03beq3g.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Tino Calancha on Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:28:03 +0200)
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier
> <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, 38796@debbugs.gnu.org, uyennhi.qm@gmail.com,
> stefankangas@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:28:03 +0200
>
> People agree with that. The friction arises because I kept the current
> implementation, which can be seen as abusing on it, and/or risky.
> [ I have neither plan nor time to redo the current implementation. ]
> >> Users can still safely modify the lossage limit with the
> >> command `update-lossage-size'. For convenience, add
> >> a function `lossage-size' to return the current limit.
> >
> > Hm... other functions use the convention of having a zero-parameter
> > function return the data, and having a parameter to set it. So
> > (lossage-size 500) could set it and (lossage-size) could return the
> > current size?
> I have amended the patch to do this. Thank you.
>
> FWIW I have been running Emacs almost 3 months using this branch
> with no issues.
> If Eli is OK with it, I can merge it to master next week.
Sorry, OK with what? where's the patch which I should agree with?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-28 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-29 17:04 bug#38796: 26.3; `view-lossage': Use a variable for the lossage limit Drew Adams
2019-12-29 17:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-29 17:34 ` Drew Adams
2020-06-26 21:58 ` Tino Calancha
2020-06-27 8:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-06-28 16:55 ` Tino Calancha
2020-06-28 18:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-06-28 20:01 ` Drew Adams
2020-06-28 21:52 ` Tino Calancha
2020-06-29 0:05 ` Drew Adams
2020-08-22 21:24 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-08-22 22:54 ` Drew Adams
2020-08-27 21:28 ` Tino Calancha
2020-08-28 6:04 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2020-09-04 9:31 ` Tino Calancha
2020-09-04 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-12 12:29 ` Tino Calancha
2020-09-17 14:35 ` Tino Calancha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83zh6fz4q1.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=38796@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=stefankangas@gmail.com \
--cc=tino.calancha@gmail.com \
--cc=uyennhi.qm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).