From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:00:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83zh35qk9p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837dqatsjd.fsf@gnu.org> <83360ytqk3.fsf@gnu.org> <83wny9scmb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eekhs5sj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6v5s3e3.fsf@gnu.org> <837dq9s12u.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36318"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 44854@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 25 21:01:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0yX-0009Io-J9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:01:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0yW-00060Q-Iw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0yO-0005yW-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0yM-0007g0-Hv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0yM-0007mv-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44854 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44854-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44854.160633444929901 (code B ref 44854); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2020 20:00:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0y9-0007mD-Fz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:00:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0y7-0007m1-D8 for 44854@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:00:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0y1-0007YG-H6; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:00:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3941 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ki0xs-00013S-PA; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:00:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Philipp Stephani on Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:35:54 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194235 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:35:54 +0100 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , Stefan Kangas , 44854@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Because when we change the default (not sure what that could be, 2030 > > > maybe?), it will change the way existing files are treated except those > > > that have a `lexical-binding:` cookie. Clearly, this is dangerous > > > > Dangerous for loaddefs.el? why? > > This is just basic risk management. When there's risk, yes. But I see no risk whatsoever in this case.