From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45054: 27.1; Can get point into the middle of a run of characters with a replacing display spec Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:50:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83zh2m4v3q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg8kb514.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtysatdg.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfebbif5.fsf@gnu.org> <831rfy6bcp.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="425"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45054@debbugs.gnu.org To: Zack Weinberg Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 09 20:59:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5cc-000AbJ-EY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 20:59:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53620 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5cb-0000ZR-Fz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:59:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5UM-000191-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5UM-0006p3-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5UM-00076T-HA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 19:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45054 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45054-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45054.160754344427279 (code B ref 45054); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 19:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45054) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2020 19:50:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5U3-00075v-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5U3-00075j-1V for 45054@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:50:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5Tx-0006Wv-Kp; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:50:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2616 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kn5Tw-0002ol-Qd; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:50:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Zack Weinberg on Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:20:15 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195570 Archived-At: > From: Zack Weinberg > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:20:15 -0500 > Cc: 45054@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:14 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Zack Weinberg > > > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:56:28 -0500 > > > Cc: 45054@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > > Are you saying that this is not a bug? > > > > Did I say that? > > I don't know, that's why I ask. You said that "The adjustment of point > to move it outside of the "forbidden" region is triggered by point > movements, while your examples don't move point" and that could be > read as "this is working as intended". It could also be read as "that's why it doesn't work as intended".