From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:48:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83zgzzyn72.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8gn8ciy.fsf@md5i.com> <83h7m95tt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1s2mp1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rz15jm.fsf@gnu.org> <831rdb0yt9.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29981"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: pipcet@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 12:50:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQm5-0007ea-Sn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:50:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQm4-0000eg-Bu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQlu-0000eW-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQlu-0007v7-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQlt-00032P-Un for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46502.161382174411604 (code B ref 46502); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 11:49:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQky-000315-8C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33132) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQkt-00030V-7q for 46502@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQkn-0007Rv-3I; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:48:53 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4595 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDQkl-00047a-Tf; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 06:48:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <831rdb0yt9.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:21:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200417 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:21:38 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org > > > From: Pip Cet > > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:15:48 +0000 > > Cc: akrl@sdf.org, mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > Can you send the diffs as an attachment? > > > > I'm sending the complete diff, even though it's a bit large... The > > path differences are obviously okay, and I'm not going to complain > > about differences in gensym numbering, but byte-optimize-lapcode, to > > pick an example at random, differs in the bytecode. > > Thanks. Stefan, any idea why we see differences here? Btw, if you let macroexp.el byte-compile uninterrupted, then rename the .elc file and re-compile the .el file, do you get identical .elc files?