From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46627: [External] : bug#46627: [PATCH] Add new help command 'describe-command' Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:17:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83zgzyxzmi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835z2o4fes.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1qzpon.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17689"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, rms@gnu.org, 46627@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 21:19:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYia-0004Ru-VX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:19:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33526 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYia-0007JM-1N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYiU-0007JC-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYiU-0006xQ-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYiU-000306-0Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46627 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46627-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46627.161385229711479 (code B ref 46627); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46627) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 20:18:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYhl-0002z5-2t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38508) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYhi-0002yr-5w for 46627@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:18:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYhc-0006aO-JF; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1767 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDYhS-0000X4-BT; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:17:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:06:47 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200457 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > CC: "larsi@gnus.org" , > "stefan@marxist.se" > , > "46627@debbugs.gnu.org" <46627@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:06:47 +0000 > > > The main difference is in the completion these commands > > offer. describe-command completes only on commands. > > Yes, that's an important difference. In addition, > _only commands are accepted_ as input, regardless > of whether you use completion. No, because RET does completion.