From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46818: leim bootstrap: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:51:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83zgzpmjhz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335xhnyfj.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1l11h2b.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12151"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 46818@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 19:53:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4iN-00033P-1o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:53:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52544 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4iM-0003Xk-3s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:53:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4i7-0003VW-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33853) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4i6-00009z-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4i6-0004TZ-B0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46818.161445193317148 (code B ref 46818); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 18:52:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4hJ-0004SW-74 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:52:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4hH-0004SJ-Uo for 46818@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:52:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4hC-0008FG-H7; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3052 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lG4h6-00057u-ER; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:52:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r1l11h2b.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200975 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Cc: Glenn Morris , 46818@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:50:04 +0000 > > >> These issues don't seem to be present at rev 6bf56a; ref > >> https://hydra.nixos.org/build/137524247 > > > > You are saying that 6bf56a broke bootstrap? I'd be surprised. > > No, Glenn's saying the opposite, that 6bf56a (among other revisions) is > free of the eager macro-expansion failure. Sorry for my misunderstanding.