From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46853: Confusing terminology "face height" instead of "font size" Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 21:35:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83zgzm7jlu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875z2a4x2c.fsf@gnus.org> <87tupu3cdd.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46853@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 20:37:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoLu-0005Zq-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:37:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48064 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoLt-0004jI-KG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKr-000428-5F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKn-0002jZ-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKn-0002Zm-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46853 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46853-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46853.16146273339868 (code B ref 46853); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46853) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 19:35:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKL-0002Z6-GZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKK-0002Yv-Mm for 46853@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKF-0002SP-GM; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:35:27 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4057 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lGoKE-0006kP-B7; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:35:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tupu3cdd.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:25:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201149 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:25:18 +0100 > Cc: 46853@debbugs.gnu.org > > (when text-scale-mode > (face-remap--remap-face 'default) > (when text-scale-remap-header-line > (face-remap--remap-face 'header-line))) > > So, OK, it's not just the `default' face, but also `header-line' > optionally. :-) You can remap other faces by hand, but that's not the original question. > > But I'd argue that it's a bug -- why shouldn't `C-x C-+' adjust > > the size of `variable-pitch'? > > I don't know the history of the command... could it be because > remapping all faces would just be too slow? No, it's because enlarging _all_ faces makes no sense.