From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47832: 28.0.50; define-fringe-bitmap and emacs --daemon Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:15:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgwjar91.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7dee3f4235cf450a3254@heytings.org> <83mttxwgm8.fsf@gnu.org> <1869622e16688e6aedec@heytings.org> <83h7k5w54l.fsf@gnu.org> <83fszpw40t.fsf@gnu.org> <1869622e16c60dc2ce0d@heytings.org> <83eef9w0xd.fsf@gnu.org> <1869622e16270efbc7e8@heytings.org> <87im3778ao.fsf@gnus.org> <83eedvc9jm.fsf@gnu.org> <835yz7c6p0.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34775"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 47832@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 15:17:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llWw6-0008kk-7X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:17:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llWw4-0005tt-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llWve-0005pJ-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llWve-00056K-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llWve-0006An-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47832 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed patch Original-Received: via spool by 47832-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47832.162194856323622 (code B ref 47832); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47832) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2021 13:16:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44980 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llWug-00068u-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llWue-000689-Dp for 47832@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llWuZ-0004MM-1z; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3484 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llWuY-0007sI-6R; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:15:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Tue, 25 May 2021 13:03:25 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207209 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:03:25 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: larsi@gnus.org, 47832@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If the standard bitmaps were overridden by user-defined ones, why do we > > need to set those overriding user-defined bitmaps once again? > > > > Sorry, I don't understand your question. > > There are three kind of bitmaps: > > 1. standard bitmaps not overridden by user-defined bitmaps > 2. standard bitmaps overridden by user-defined bitmaps > 3. user-defined bitmaps > > The first loop processes the bitmaps of the first kind, the second loop > the bitmaps of the second and third kind. I'm asking why do we need to process the second kind here. That kind was already set up when user initializations defined replacements for those standard bitmaps. Right? So why do we need to set them up again?