From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49558: fill paragraph in texinfo-mode fails with @ Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:03:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgup6lh2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7gxmj5s.fsf@gnus.org> <83im1d85pt.fsf@gnu.org> <837dht82g9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13387"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, lisa-asket@perso.be, 49558@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 16:05:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fVu-0003Hz-AL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 16:05:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fVs-0000FJ-Ip for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fVW-0000Ev-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fVW-0003iv-GA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fVW-0004rT-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49558 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 49558-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49558.162627144618580 (code B ref 49558); Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2021 14:04:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fUc-0004pc-KP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fUa-0004p7-AQ for 49558@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fUS-00032p-PW; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2588 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m3fUS-0004JA-DF; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:03:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:49:27 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209936 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, lisa-asket@perso.be, 49558@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:49:27 -0400 > > >> In which sense do our default values not heed this rule? > > The same line could match both paragraph-start and paragraph-separate. > > But that rule doesn't say they can't, it just implies that if a line > matches both then it will be treated as a paragraph separator: > > Lines that start a new paragraph and are contained in it must > match only ‘paragraph-start’, not ‘paragraph-separate’. That's not my reading of that text, so I guess it should be reworded (to avoid the implied double negation).