From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50394: Improve "Completion List Mode" NEWS entry Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:25:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgsrtluu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a6krv81b.fsf@gnu.org> <871r63pigw.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6852"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, 50394@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 05 11:26:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPi-0001Zk-9Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 11:26:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54044 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPh-0004Yi-B1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPa-0004W3-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPZ-00067U-Uu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPZ-0003C0-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50394 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50394-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50394.163083395612258 (code B ref 50394); Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2021 09:25:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49209 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPT-0003Be-MQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50970) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPS-0003BS-AO for 50394@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPL-0005vk-LQ; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:25:47 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4653 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMoPH-0006iv-Hg; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 05:25:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871r63pigw.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:52:31 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213476 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Kangas , ghe@sdf.org, 50394@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:52:31 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> as IIUC it is an implementation detail. > > > > ??? No, it's a complete major mode, according to its doc string. > > I was also confused by that entry -- perhaps changing it to something to > emphasise that it's an actual mode would help. I.e.: > > ** Completion List Mode > > New key bindings have been added to 'completion-list-mode': 'n' and 'p' > to navigate completions, (etc) Sure, if that helps, why not. I thought the conversion from a mode's name to its Lisp symbol was something widely known.