From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57400: 29.0.50; Support sending patches from VC directly Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 12:21:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83zgfqyrcr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84v8qgn1z9.fsf@iki.fi> <87h71zo3p8.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfljmgwz.fsf@posteo.net> <83sflj1dbo.fsf@gnu.org> <87fshjmeje.fsf@posteo.net> <83mtbr1b6l.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu5zky6k.fsf@posteo.net> <83lerb197w.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1vbjfpp.fsf@posteo.net> <83h71z13xc.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8qecd0v.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10579"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57400@debbugs.gnu.org, ane@iki.fi To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 27 11:26:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRs5O-0002cW-Ry for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 11:26:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42808 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRs5L-0000o2-Gg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzy-0005zQ-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzy-0000Sn-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzy-0005Oi-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 09:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57400.166159206020732 (code B ref 57400); Sat, 27 Aug 2022 09:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2022 09:21:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzw-0005OJ-A8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzu-0005O5-H0 for 57400@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzp-0000SL-3h; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:20:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=bfmgng26w30d7WAiCf4+Unka1PpTacOm+0104xvwCFI=; b=CRCsTjTjx2Kh PGfvEdq4Lu7RirXYnMmtTZkBG6npgj5qC0pgnT/8MAQeoxI9rzHUYaEJuUkfaNTPRprx9/P01wKTk DFeGD9r/ozNhqLgc0guxZRHdTirg4z0ac/KZs8H8j1NZ38EHvSb1UXTmO1TolOGEMzp64+m9e9HVF QPk1cacav/trYyGmQhEFvMZHrpGwOHFfHrMHmgJWY8Yd1IqzsBzVoWYmMxpKAPajvHXHspAmReaRt mOJ4yfUJAcLKze1DjXByy/ow4GQzN2Zfy6Zk4gy0lz+LQNdO84AlPphH1r885gLgVFCG/wTdrtvgQ /OFs+/KCXt/xSXpcgU9U1g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2782 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRrzo-0002Np-HK; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 05:20:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v8qecd0v.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Sat, 27 Aug 2022 08:21:36 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240888 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: ane@iki.fi, 57400@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 08:21:36 +0000 > > But there are plenty of projects that will only accept patches > formatted and sent by "git send-email". If you send them an attachment > with a patch, they might complain and ask you to send it back again > using "git send-email". > > Once again, I don't think we disagree on anything substantial here. You > have already said that it is fine to implement support for both, and > everything beyond that should not matter for the proposal. So why are we still arguing?