From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12468: 24.2; emacs becomes increasingly sluggish Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:04:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83y5k7yu6a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5058BC24.30201@mcw.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347998746 15450 80.91.229.3 (18 Sep 2012 20:05:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12468@debbugs.gnu.org To: Rodney Sparapani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 22:05:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43J-0001Ab-I0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51668 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43E-00034J-U3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43B-00033a-QT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43A-0005pq-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:05:41 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43A-0005pm-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TE44U-0000iD-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12468 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12468-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12468.13479987732577 (code B ref 12468); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12468) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2012 20:06:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42267 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43g-0000fU-N8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:33624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TE43Q-0000eH-9c for 12468@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:06:11 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAK00D00AED2400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12468@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:04:03 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAK00DDHAER0Y30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:04:03 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5058BC24.30201@mcw.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64575 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:23:32 -0500 > From: Rodney Sparapani > > I recently upgraded to 24.2 from 23.1 and I like 24.2 much better; great > job fixing bugs and adding features! However, I noticed that after > working for 30 minutes or so; emacs becomes increasingly sluggish. So, > I decided to profile it. I've never done profiling before. But, this > seemed like the perfect time to try it; I really would rather use > 24.2! The profiling is below. The amount of time consumed by > valid_image_p seems suspicious (the formatting is a little screwy so I'm > attaching it too)... > > Flat profile: > > Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. > % cumulative self self total > time seconds seconds calls ms/call ms/call name > 81.64 476.19 476.19 448475 1.06 1.06 valid_image_p I think this is a duplicate of 12463, see there for a patch that might solve your problem as well.