From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21505: 24.4; Buffer order Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:56:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83y4g55yat.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337yd7hgn.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnppmk0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442473044 12102 80.91.229.3 (17 Sep 2015 06:57:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21505@debbugs.gnu.org, travis.hoppe@gmail.com To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 17 08:57:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT81-00074f-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:57:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT80-0008Vs-IK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT7x-0008Vj-BB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT7u-0006BQ-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT7u-0006BK-24 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT7t-0002lQ-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21505 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21505-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21505.144247299010583 (code B ref 21505); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21505) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2015 06:56:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT7N-0002kc-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:56:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:54098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZcT7K-0002kT-Jz for 21505@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NUT00A006Z9JU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 21505@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:56:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NUT00AXV7A0KS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:56:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <877fnppmk0.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106680 Archived-At: > From: Tassilo Horn > Cc: hoppe , 21505@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:49:51 +0200 > > And to me, the order a, b, c seems to be the only right one. You do realize that the command line said just "*", and the order of the files Emacs saw was determined by the expansion of that wildcard by the shell, yes? Or are you saying that the order of the buffers should always be alphabetical?