From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21681: [PATCH] Fix formatting of lexical-binding at eof warning Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:53:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83y4f5wd3w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fv1dxvmq.fsf@gnu.org> <831tcxxs72.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444845318 31906 80.91.229.3 (14 Oct 2015 17:55:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21681@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 19:55:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQGZ-00063n-F3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43798 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQGY-0000vS-L3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQFZ-0000h8-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQFW-0004L5-Kv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQFW-0004Kq-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQFW-0001xh-D6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21681 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 21681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21681.14448452237517 (code B ref 21681); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2015 17:53:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQFC-0001xB-Vh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:60832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZmQFA-0001x2-Q5 for 21681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NW8006001374U00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 21681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:49:37 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NW800N751IP9J90@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:49:37 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:107617 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:47:40 -0400 > From: Noam Postavsky > Cc: 21681@debbugs.gnu.org > > How about making display-warning print all TYPE symbols then? Fine with me, but I don't know enough about display-warning and its uses to tell if this could cause some harm somewhere. Maybe someone else will know; if you hear no objections in a few days, please go ahead.