From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22019: 25.0.50; Bad comment in `character-fold-to-regexp' Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:54:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4djstz9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3a754c45-2dc0-403f-9396-cefca118454d@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448614524 4127 80.91.229.3 (27 Nov 2015 08:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22019@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:55:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Eo7-0007sd-S5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:55:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2EoA-0006Pc-20 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Eo6-0006OL-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Eo2-0000s2-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Eo2-0000ry-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Eo2-0006oD-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22019 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22019-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22019.144861447626139 (code B ref 22019); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22019) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2015 08:54:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Enc-0006nW-5c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:43057) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a2Ena-0006nM-GH for 22019@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 03:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYG00400TU2LJ00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 22019@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:54:02 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYG00M7JU22XP70@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:54:02 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109327 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:38:33 -0500 > Cc: 22019@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This part of an explanatory comment is inadequate and inappropriate: > > > ;; See commit message for a longer description. > > That's right. GNU standard practices say the place to put > an explanation is in a comment, not in a change log. > > Can someone please fix this one now? Done.