From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22046: [PATCH] Improve version-to-list parsing Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:34:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83y4dgma7k.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448854512 4083 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2015 03:35:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Dunn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 04:35:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FF4-0001pz-8c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:35:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FF8-0006yR-Dx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FF5-0006xA-4n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FF0-0003wT-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FF0-0003wO-2y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FEz-0008Dm-OL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:35:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22046.144885448931559 (code B ref 22046); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2015 03:34:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FEn-0008Cx-7w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:34:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:34548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3FEl-0008Cp-JK for 22046@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:34:48 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYL00G00YQAHD00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 22046@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:34:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYL00GTQZ9XA070@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:34:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109432 Archived-At: > From: Alex Dunn > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 16:09:12 -0800 > > > Woops. “alpha0.9” is parsed as '(0 9 -3), but “alpha-0.9” is parsed as > '(0 9). Shouldn’t be hard to fix, though, if this behavior is desired. Which part(s) of the string is/are the version in each case, in your opinion?