From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23929: 25.0.95; Doc of run-at-time doesn't describe behaviour if system was sleeping at time Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 19:56:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83y45ag388.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878txaj0bh.fsf@moondust.awandering> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468083452 4469 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2016 16:57:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 16:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23929@debbugs.gnu.org To: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 18:57:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvZ8-0001dD-T3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 18:57:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvZ8-0006yY-3D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvYy-0006vX-9a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:57:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvYs-0007Jj-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvYs-0007Jf-8W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvYs-00014e-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 16:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23929 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23929-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23929.14680833884088 (code B ref 23929); Sat, 09 Jul 2016 16:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23929) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2016 16:56:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvYK-00013r-B2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:56:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvYJ-00013f-H5 for 23929@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvY9-000733-J8 for 23929@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:56:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvY9-00072r-G9; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1898 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvY6-0003a6-B3; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:56:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <878txaj0bh.fsf@moondust.awandering> (nljlistbox2@gmail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120704 Archived-At: > From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) > Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:30:42 -0300 > > The documentation of run-at-time -- the doc string and (info "(elisp) > Timers") -- does not say what happens if the system was sleeping when > the timer would have run. It also doesn't say what happens if Emacs didn't get any CPU time when the timer would have run -- which is a more general description of the situation you mention. If instead Perform an action at time TIME. we say Perform an action at or after time TIME. will this take care of the issue you are raising?