From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25107: Acknowledgement (Patches to clean up ispell.el) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:01:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83y3zthr75.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8360mxjbti.fsf@gnu.org> <831sxlj9ow.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481047344 28486 195.159.176.226 (6 Dec 2016 18:02:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 18:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25107@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 19:02:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK4I-0006bV-6m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:02:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33709 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK4L-0004eS-TM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK48-0004d3-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK42-0004VX-Kj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK42-0004VO-He for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK42-0006nB-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 18:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25107.148104730126080 (code B ref 25107); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 18:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2016 18:01:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK3g-0006mY-Ur for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55083) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK3e-0006mM-W3 for 25107@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK3W-0004Oz-Gx for 25107@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:01:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK3W-0004Ot-E9; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:01:30 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4620 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cEK3V-0002wl-OM; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:01:30 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Reuben Thomas on Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:46:23 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126565 Archived-At: > From: Reuben Thomas > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:46:23 +0000 > Cc: 25107@debbugs.gnu.org > > I agree with the general point, but in this case we are talking about > mentioning a small number of file names in the doc string. Doesn't > seem like a burden to me, and whoever put that information there > probably didn't see it as such, either. > > ​In that case I will add the information for Enchant. At least it is not likely to change.​ Sure, that's what I meant. > I was thinking about someone using the result to report the version > they have, e.g. as part of a bug report. > > ​​Version of what? If of Emacs, then that version information is already provided by report-emacs-bug. If of a > spellchecker, then that information is still provided by the revised message. It's admittedly a minor issue, but just to make myself clear: I thought about reporting the version not as part of report-emacs-bug. Or let me ask this: why does ispell-version at all exist? Perhaps I'm confused about its purpose.