From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22819: 25.0.91; Don't try to indent region if the buffer is read-only Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:05:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83y3qtswvv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vam26amc.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lgmywlo4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502219238 32754 195.159.176.226 (8 Aug 2017 19:07:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 19:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22819@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 08 21:07:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1df9qQ-0007wM-IR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 21:07:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44122 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1df9qT-0005e5-Gf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1df9qL-0005ds-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1df9qI-0002KH-4b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1df9qI-0002Jn-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1df9qH-00079t-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 19:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22819 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 22819-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22819.150221919027474 (code B ref 22819); Tue, 08 Aug 2017 19:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22819) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2017 19:06:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52221 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1df9pl-000794-PP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54184) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1df9pk-00078s-MJ for 22819@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1df9pc-000258-E7 for 22819@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:06:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1df9pc-000254-AK; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1418 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1df9pZ-0003BI-O5; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:06:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Kaushal Modi on Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:06:52 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135577 Archived-At: > From: Kaushal Modi > Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:06:52 +0000 > Cc: 22819@debbugs.gnu.org > > @Eli: Based on the discussion[1] on emacs-devel, there isn't any opposition to doing what's proposed in this > bug thread. So if it's alright by you, and if there is no strong reason to use the more concise alternative i.e. if > both barf-if-buffer-read-only and interactive "*.." are equally correct, can the former approach be committed? I'm not sure what is it that you are asking me. You already know my opinion on this proposal, and it hasn't changed.