From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28266: 25.2; RMAIL FCC coding issue Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:08:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83y3p6bioi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h8vudgfd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506110954 22712 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2017 20:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org To: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 22 22:09:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUG5-0005cp-BC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 22:09:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60830 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUGC-0002yI-Nd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUG2-0002wH-PL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFy-0003aG-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFx-0003aA-Tp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFx-0005C1-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28266 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28266-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28266.150611091419924 (code B ref 28266); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28266) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2017 20:08:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFW-0005BH-3J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFT-0005B5-NP for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFJ-0003Cq-UK for 28266@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFJ-0003Ck-R2; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:21 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1074 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dvUFI-0004Gb-GU; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:08:21 -0400 In-reply-to: (charles@aurox.ch) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137254 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:45 +0200 > From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) > CC: 28266@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:13:58 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > I cannot reproduce this with the current emacs-26 branch tip. > > However, in my case, Emacs asked for a suitable coding-system each > > time I wanted to send a message. Answering UTF-8 produced a valid > > encoding in both cases. > > > > So perhaps the difference, and the reason for a problem you see, is > > the default encoding in your case, which you didn't show. (In my > > case, the default is Latin-1.) > > Hmm, I was never queried for a coding system. Because your default is UTF-8. This is normal. > I've repeated the issue on GNU/Linux with 25.3 and macOS with 25.3 > and emacs-26. And I don't set any special locales/language > environments: > > > Important settings: > > value of $LANG: en_GB.UTF-8 > > locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix With en_US.UTF-8 on GNU/Linux, using the current emacs-26 branch, I see no problem: both messages are sent with a correct encoding. What happens if you don't visit the FCC file after the first message is sent, only after the second? Do you still see the second message encoded incorrectly?