From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35495: 27.0.50; Untarring an archive with a keyring.gpg inside Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 16:06:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83y33dcf9a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imuk4m7u.fsf@gmail.com> <871s179qsl.fsf@gmail.com> <83imuhebb4.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="234040"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35495@debbugs.gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org, federicotedin@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 11 15:07:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRiZ-000ylG-O7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 15:07:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRiY-0001ro-Bl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRiR-0001rW-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRiQ-0001zh-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRiQ-0001za-0w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRiP-0006Ic-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 13:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35495.155757999024175 (code B ref 35495); Sat, 11 May 2019 13:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2019 13:06:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40053 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRht-0006Hr-PE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38967) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRhs-0006Hf-7k for 35495@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRhm-0001ca-CZ; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:06:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2518 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hPRhe-00006v-IR; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:06:18 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 11 May 2019 08:55:55 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159080 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: federicotedin@gmail.com, 35495@debbugs.gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org > Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 08:55:55 -0400 > > > It isn't clear to me how you distinguish between the file-name > > handlers that should and shouldn't be disabled here. > > Each file-name handler will make that decision on its own. Will each handler also write code to implement that decision? If so, we can stop being bothered by that issue. But if someone of us will have to implement that decision, the question still stands, doesn't it?